One regulatory question, in thirty seconds, in your pocket — with
who wrote it, what was known that day, and the path anyone can
reopen. Folio does not sell you the answer. It shows you
what an answer rests on, and where it stops.
Not foundNo binding source settles this scope question
ReadingAdvisor
A rule moves. Somebody will ask what it means for your work.
The honest answer has a shape — and most of it is not the answer.
What an answer carries
Eight layers, every time.
Folio's response contract is fixed. A short answer without its basis
is not a shorter answer; it is a different product. Scroll, and the
screen stays while the contract passes it — the layer you are
reading is the one marked on the phone.
Response
Contract v1
The threshold moves to CHF 15 000.
01The direct answer
02Applicability · one scope question open
03Operational impact
04Regulation → obligation → control → evidence
05Consequences, separated
06Sources, dates, one conflict kept
07Receipt · 7 executed, 1 unavailable
08The human decision boundary
ReadingAdvisor
01The direct answer.First, and never alone.
02Applicability, and the scope questions that stay open.What this source does not settle is said, not smoothed.
03Operational impact.What has to change in the work, if anything.
04Regulation to obligation to process to control to evidence.The chain, in the order a reviewer walks it.
05Consequences, separated.Statutory, supervisory and operational are different questions.
06Sources, authority, dates, conflicts and missing evidence.A conflict is kept, not averaged away.
07A claim-level receipt, including what could not be executed.An unavailable check is part of the answer.
08The accountable human decision boundary.Folio prepares. You decide, and the record says so.
Eight layers, and the last one is a person.
Folio's work ends where the decision begins. The contract is
what makes that boundary legible instead of implied — and what
makes the eighth layer a line somebody signs, rather than a
disclaimer at the bottom of a screen.
Two separate lanes
One reads the rule. One explains TAIA.
They never borrow each other's authority, and the app never pretends
the second one is the first. Different sources, different
guarantees, both labelled on screen.
Lane 01 · Reading
It selects. It does not write.
Public sources — FINMA, Fedlex, EU material — quoted verbatim with
their authority, their dates and their conflicts kept visible. The
model chooses which passage answers you; not one word of the
answer is generated.
Chosen, quoted, digest verified — nothing written
Public material only.
Lane 02 · The TAIA Digital Advisor
It speaks TAIA, from TAIA's own documents.
A separate conversation about TAIA's ideas and mechanisms,
answered on three floors — plain, then the ground it stands on,
then how it is built. Every sentence rests on a passage you can
see; an unsupported one is reported, not hidden.
PlainStart here — the answer in ordinary words.
GroundWhy TAIA holds that position at all.
BuiltWhich mechanism carries it, and where.
A fictional AI persona — not a human, not a licensed adviser
Internal policy, committee material and team interpretation belong
to Atelier, with an explicit handoff. Client, transaction and
decision records are never accepted here.
It prepares; it does not decide
Not a legal adviser, not a regulatory approval, not an autonomous
decision maker. The authorised human owns the decision and the
record says so.
It shows its own red
Retrieval and answer quality remain independently unvalidated.
Where an answer is partial, Folio names the missing part rather
than closing the gap with fluent prose.
AnsweredNamed as missing
The line is drawn by what actually ran, not by what would look
finished.
In build · nothing to download yet
Where it stands
Coming soon. Described honestly until then.
Folio is in build. This page carries no download, no waiting list and
no release date — when there is something to open, it will be here.